New TLT measurements in the Netherlands now go up to 40kms (25 miles) and find lake surfaces non-uniform with the Geoid surface. The surface of Lake Balaton (Hungary) and Lake Ijssel (Netherlands) are non convex and the curvature is not detectable. As all large bodies of water should follow the geo-potential surface. We definitely proved that the WGS84 model is incorrect.
Final results: FECORE measurements disprove the WGS84 model by proving flat lake surface!
There’s only two choices in the masonic world of deception; Convex & Flat.. How has an experiment on such a level ignored the possibility of concavity? No measurements were ever taken to explore this possibility, why?
concaveearthunbound Thanks for your question. The answer is simple. But first I speak for FECORE when I say that we are not stuck on any one shape. We are performing unbiased tests to determine what we can about the earth we live on. What we find is what guides our conclusions. So here is the answer.
Our observation showed that a laser at 2 meters above the water was visible to the unaided eye of observers at 40 km away on the same lake. The observer’s eyes were also 2 meters above the water. And the observers and the camera could see the reflection in the water of the laser beam across the surface of the lake. This is the same as we see the sun or the moon low in the sky over any body of water. We see the reflection of the moon or the laser across the water. That could not occur if the water were curved either convex or concave.
Now that does not mean that over distances much farther than say 1000 miles the earth could have a concave curve but it would have to be much less curve than the heliocentric model believes the convex curve is.
Indeed, we only perceive the radiated reflection of all luminaries when on the horizon, which is much more prominent within a concave surface, just as a parabolic mirror; its holographic properties intensify this multidimensional illusion in many layers, often as a mock mirage. The inversion layers are actually caused by surface refraction beyond our realm of perception, not the atmosphere. Everything refracts downward at this point. I point much of this out on my YouTube channel ‘Rethinking Everything’, as well as its potential association to symbolism. I must point out that your statement is completely incorrect, much of this reflection is actually more likely within a concave surface & less apparent on a flat. How else would crepuscular rays reflect off earth straight over our heads if we existed on the plain of inertia? Rainbows display a dielectric property overall.
Sorry I took so long to respond. My computer was just repaired and just now back on to see this.
I will check out you videos and information. At fecore we welcome any information and observations that
show us what is real. So I will study this. And our core members are always checking our tests at all phases
to verify that the data is meaningful, accurate and that we interpret it accurately.
If its convex we will report it. If its flat we will report it. Id its convex we will report it.
But one thing we won’t do is fudge data to support a pet theory.
Thank you.
PS Thank heaven we are not bound by anything masonic.